Reviewing our book reviews: fifty years and counting.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The editorial team of The Gerontologist has been committed to providing its readers with up-to-date information about recently published books focused on gerontological science and practice since the inception of the journal in 1961. The initial issue of the journal included a list of recently published books. The first formal book review (of You Can't Count on Dying, by Natalie Harris Cabot) was written by Joseph T. Freeman, MD, and appeared in the September 1961 issue. Early reviews were sporadic, brief, and featured a single book. By the 1970s, several issues of the journal included multiple book reviews, each written by a separate reviewer. In August 1974, a " Book Briefs " section was initiated in which several books of a similar genre were reviewed together. The June 1979 issue of The Gerontologist introduced S. Donna Lind, PhD, as its first book review editor. Recognizing the voluminous magnitude of materials emerging about aging, The Gerontologist sought to provide broad coverage and usable information to its readers. The journal used multiple formats, including brief overviews, conventional book reviews, and in-depth critiques. In the early days, the size of the gerontological community was so small that it was difficult to identify reviewers who were not best friends and/or competitors of the book authors. By the end of her term as book review editor, Lind noted that the explosion of new books on aging made it impossible to review all of them. She described forming a book review panel of about 20 gerontologists who agreed to receive publications and evaluate them for review consideration. She observed that " it is easy to write bland uncritical reviews—less so if criticism seems warranted in the reviewer's opinion. But it does take some courage and one does run a risk when criticizing a so-called senior scholar. " (December 1981). 1989) continued to present review essays of related books, conventional book reviews, and a " Briefly Noted " section of short reviews. The " Books Received " section was categorized and presented by topic. In their jointly authored editorial, Applebaum and Markson (October 1986) reported that the journal received approximately 300 books per year of which there was space to review only about 45. Prior to 1988, book reviews were published by the Journal of Gerontology as well as The Gerontologist, with careful coordination on the part of the editors to avoid duplication. In 1988, the Journal …
منابع مشابه
LINGUIST List 22.4325: Review: Text/Corpus Linguistics; Cognitive Science: Wulff (2008)
This LINGUIST List issue is a review of a book published by one of our supporting publishers, commissioned by our book review editorial staff. We welcome discussion of this book review on the list, and particularly invite the author(s) or editor(s) of this book to join in. If you are interested in reviewing a book for LINGUIST, look for the most recent posting with the subject "Reviews: AVAILAB...
متن کاملGoodreads Versus Amazon: The Effect of Decoupling Book Reviewing And Book Selling
Book reviewing is a commonplace activity on many ecommerce sites. However, it is nested within the broader context of book buying and selling. Goodreads, an online platform for social curation of book collections, provides an opportunity to observe on-line book reviewing in an environment that is not (at least overtly) focused on commercialization. In this study, we perform a careful comparativ...
متن کاملBook Review: 'Ecolinguistics: Language and ecology'
Ecolinguistics: language and ecology delivers an overall view and a critical approach on ecolinguistic studies. This book is an excellent resource to students, researchers, linguists and those working in the area of discourse analysis as well as ecology. The book claims presenting a news course for ecolinguistics including a framework for understanding the theory of ecolinguistics, exploration ...
متن کاملContext-Dependent Product Evaluations: An Empirical Analysis of Internet Book Reviews
Using book review data on Amazon.com, the authors extend current research into online consumer reviews by empirically investigating the context dependence effect in the review writing process. They find that when product quality remains constant, later reviews tend to differ from previously posted ones, and the difference is moderated by the popularity of the product, the variance of previous r...
متن کاملBook reviews in humanities research evaluations
Bibliometric evaluations of research outputs in the social sciences and humanities are challenging due to limitations associated with Web of Science data; however background literature shows that scholars are interested in stimulating improvements. We give special attention to book reviews processed by Web of Science history and literature journals, focusing on two types: Type I (i.e., referenc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Gerontologist
دوره 51 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011